Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hukill

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 2, 2017No. 17-0003/ARPublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Contrary to his pleas, a military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted Specialist Christopher B. Hukill of rape and abusive sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2012). Hukill was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, seven years of confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a reduction to E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals denied HukilPs initial appeal which was based on a claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  3. United States v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  2. Joseph Ward, III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. LewisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  4. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  5. United States v. RambharoseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API