Legal Opinion

Ross v. Raymer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1948No. 30615PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This was an action to recover for services alleged to have been performed and for expenses alleged to have been incurred and paid by the plaintiff for the benefit of a person, now deceased, whose estate is presently being administered by the executrix, named as defendant in the suit.

The complaint alleged that, during the period between November 30, 1942, and April 2, 1943, while the decedent, Alice Faye Boyce, was alive and was acting as the personal representative of J. A. Boyce, deceased, plaintiff rendered certain services and incurred certain expenses, all at the special instance and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Western Oil Refining Co. v. UnderwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. McKevitt v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McManis v. LloydWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Troyer v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kellogg v. GleesonWashington Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Johnson v. NasiWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API