Legal Opinion
In Re Monroe Well Service, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 3, 1986No. 19-11788PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:
Before me is the debtors’ motion to “Compel Further Continuation of Payments.” This motion seeks to enjoin creditors from exercising their state created rights against non-debtors and raises issues involving the scope of the bankruptcy court’s powers under 11 U.S.C. § 105 to stay the actions of entities who are not subject to 11 U.S.C. § 362. In order to understand the reasons why the debtors have sought to invoke the court’s section 105 powers, and why, in my discretion, I am very reluctantly exercising those powers, it is first necessary to set out the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. Asbestos Litigation Group (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Manville Corp. v. Equity Security Holders Committee (In re Johns-Manville Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Monarch Life Insurance v. Ropes & GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Solidus Networks, Inc. v. Excel Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sinkow v. Latimer (In Re Latimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- U.I.U. Health & Welfare Fund Ex Rel. Serembus v. Levit (In Re Futura Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.