Legal Opinion

Sinkow v. Latimer (In Re Latimer)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1988No. 17-13543PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Consolidated for disposition before us are an adversary proceeding by a large creditor of the Debtors objecting to their discharge on the basis of 11 U.S.C. §§ 727 (a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(5), and a motion to dismiss the Debtors’ bankruptcy case filed by the plaintiff in the adversary proceeding and joined by another creditor on the basis of 11 U.S.C. §§ 707(a) and 105(a).

In the adversary proceeding, we find that the creditor fell far short of meeting its necessarily stiff burdens of establishing cause for denial of the Debtors’ discharge pursuant to 11…

2Cases cited32 opinions

In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
Furness v. LilienfieldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1983
In Re Monroe Well Service, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,178 in Re M. Ibrahim Khan, P.S.C., Debtor. M. Ibrahim Khan v. Dolly K. YusufjiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Bartle v. Flick (In Re Flick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

In Re David G. Zick, Debtor. Industrial Insurance Services, Inc. v. David G. ZickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
In Re: Danny Padilla, Debtor. William T. Neary, United States Trustee for Region 16 v. Danny PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
Huckfeldt v. Huckfeldt (In re Huckfeldt)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
MacLeod v. Arcuri (In Re Arcuri)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
In Re KhanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.