Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strack v. Capital Services Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 2004No. CA 03-916Published

1DissentAndree Layton Roaf, Judge

I would reach the merits of this case because the trial judge’s order resolved all ofStrack’s claims against CSG. The language of the order could not be clearer. It reads:

Pursuant to the Arkansas Declaratory Judgment Act, codified in Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-111-101 et. seq, Plaintiff [CSG] is entitled to Declaratory Judgment in its favor and against Defendant Joe I. Strack establishing that Plaintiff has no further liability or obligation to Defendant Strack and that Strack holds no further valid claims against CSG.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glover v. Woodhaven Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Phi Kappa Tau Housing Corp. v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Tapp v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. BrinkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Fox v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API