Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Brinker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 12, 2002No. 01-1435PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

This appeal is a continuation of the controversy we addressed in Brinker v. Forrest City School Dist. No 7, 344 Ark. 171, 40 S.W.3d 265 (2001) relating to injuries appellee Overtus Brinker sustained in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of the school district and its employee, Virginia Roland. The original complaint was amended on December 4, 1996, naming Brinker’s insurance provider, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. (Farm Bureau) as a defendant based on its underinsured tortfeasor coverage of Brinker. Brinker sought $100,000.00 in damages.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Glover v. Woodhaven Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Equifax, Inc. v. LusterDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1978
  4. Newcourt Financial, Inc. v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. National Standard Insurance v. WestbrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Judy v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Daniel v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. StampsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. StampsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Carlisle Farms and Transportation LLC v. United Financial Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API