Legal Opinion

Fox v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1999No. CA 99-410PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Bird, Judge.

Appellant Roxanne Fox brings this appeal stating that the trial court erred in holding that it did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear matters pertaining to alimony and child support and in finding that appellee Glen Fox has a valid and enforceable money judgment against appellant. We affirm.

Roxanne Fox and Glen Fox were married in 1990 and made their home in Louisiana. A child was born to them in 1993. In 1996, the parties were divorced by order of the District Court of St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana. The parties were given joint custody of the child;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Bright v. GassCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Douthitt v. DouthittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Magness v. McEntireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Crittenden County v. WillifordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harbison v. JohnstonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Mitchell v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Allen v. Arkansas Dep't of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Strack v. Capital Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API