Legal Opinion

Field-Martin Co. v. Fruen Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1941No. 32,674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment discharging a mechanic’s lien for a claimed unpaid balance of the contract price for a building constructed by plaintiff, Field-Martin Company, for the Fruen Milling Company.; They will be mentioned, respectively, as plaintiff and defendant. The trial involved claims of others with which on this appeal we are not concerned. Both parties assert that the work ivas done under express contract. The issue was whether, as plaintiff claims, it was done under what we shall refer to as plan No. 1, or, as defendant asserts, under plan No. 2.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Benedict v. PfunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Enge v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. In Re Estate SoperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. City of Marshall v. GregoireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Industrial Products Mfg. Co. v. Jewett Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Sorensen v. P. H. Thompson & SonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API