Legal Opinion
City of Marshall v. Gregoire
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 1935No. Nos. 30,063, 30,064, 30,067PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 259 N.W. 377. Action against a city treasurer and his surety. After trial without a jury, there was decision for plaintiff against defendant Gregoire, the treasurer, for the full amount claimed, but against his surety, United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, for a smaller sum. All the parties separately appeal from the judgment.
Marshall is a city of the fourth class organized under the general laws. I Mason Minn. 1927, § 1265, et seq. In 1926 defendant Gregoire became and has since remained its treasurer, having been annually reëlected by the council for successive terms of one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- City of Minneapolis v. CanterburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- School District No. 1, Itasca County v. AitonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. of ScrantonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Telex Corporation v. D. E. BalchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Rien, Trustee, Etc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Jorgenson v. Girard Fire Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- In Re Estate SoperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Brener v. Industrial Steel Container Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.