Legal Opinion
Labrador v. Seattle Mortgage Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 15, 2010No. Case 08-2270 SCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Two motions are now before the Court in this matter. The first is the Motion for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”) filed by Defendant Seattle Mortgage Company (“SMC” or “Defendant”). Docket No. 48. The second is Plaintiff Mary Labrador’s (“Labrador’s” or “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (“Mot. to Amend”). Docket No. 51. Both Motions are fully briefed. Docket Nos. 56 (“PL’s Opp’n to MSJ”), 58 (“SMC Opp’n to Mot. to Amend”), 60 (“SMC Reply re…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kenneally v. Bank of Nova ScotiaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010