Legal Opinion
(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 15, 2022No. 1:19-cv-00367Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-JLT-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD 13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 VASQUEZ, et al., (Doc. 88) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Larry William Cortinas, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 On March 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Plaintiff Seeks The Courts 21 Permission To File This Attached Amended Complaint Rule 15.(2)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Owens v. HinsleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.