Legal Opinion

Taplin & Rowell v. Clark

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 11, 1915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Trover for a horse. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the March Term, 1914, Orleans County, Butter, J., presiding. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

This ease was tried and facts found by the court. It is said by the plaintiffs that the supplemental findings of fact are no part of the case, because made after the expiration of the time within which the court could by law make additional findings. However this may be, we pay no attention to the question. The supplementary findings were made in answer to defendant’s request to strike out a certain part of the original findings, and we give her the benefit of them for what they are worth.

It is found that on September 16, 1913, “the defendant was engaged in the occupation of-farming and owned…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lapham v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  2. Ballard v. BurtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  3. Waite v. StanleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  4. Stillwell v. FarewellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
  5. Fay v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  3. Pocket v. AlmonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Zurich General Accident & Liability Assurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Cayton v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API