Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Banks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1978No. 1200, SC 25221; No. 1201, SC 25221; No. 1388, SC 25692PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before the court upon objections to the cost bills filed in the above-entitled disciplinary matters. This court’s opinions disposing of the matters made no mention of whether the Bar was entitled to costs. It has been contended that costs are not allowed automatically but may be awarded only by this court in an opinion reviewing a decision or recommendation of the review board as required by ORS 9.535(4) and that the opinion of the court in this case did not award costs. The court requested briefs on the proper procedure for the allowance of costs in such matters as well as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re BrownsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lane County Public Works Ass'n Local 626 v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Netterville v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bahrenfus v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API