Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
Rhone Poulenc, Inc. (plaintiff) moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1585 and 2643(c)(1) (1982) and Rules 60(b) and 82(b) of the Rules of this Court to set aside judgments of dismissal for lack of prosecution and restore twelve actions to the Court’s suspension disposition calendar. The Court finds that the motion is beyond the 30 day limit of 28 U.S.C. § 2646 (1982) and must be denied for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Synthetic silica was found to be classifiable duty free under item 523.11 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States in the test case of Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Manufacture De MacHines Du Haut-Rhin v. Von RaabUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Star Sales & Distributing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- United States v. Torch Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Carisbrook Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.