Legal Opinion

Carisbrook Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 14, 1989No. Court Nos. 86-08-01020, 86-10-01260, and 86-10-01261Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

Plaintiff moves to vacate dismissal of three actions. Two of these actions, Court Nos. 86-10-01260 and 86-10-01261, were dismissed on November 9, 1987 for lack of prosecution. More than one year later, plaintiff filed a motion for vacation of dismissal of all three actions under Rule 60(b)(1) of this court. Rule 60(b) of this court states that: "The motion [for relief from a final judgment] shall be made within a reasonable time, and for [mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect] not more *737than one year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API