Legal Opinion
Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew Cate
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 21, 2012No. 08-55404PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Destinni Mardesich appeals the district court’s dismissal of three claims in her federal habeas petition as untimely under the one-year statute of limitations set forth in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Because we apply the AED-PA statute of limitations on a claim-by-claim basis, and because Mardesich’s three claims challenging a state administrative agency’s order were filed nearly 18 months after the statute of limitations expired, we affirm the district court’s dismissal.
I
A
When Destinni Mardesich was 16, she…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Anthony Butler v. David LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Prendergast v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- In re: Clinton YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.