Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Chief Judge:
Petitioner Michael Duane Zack’s appeal from the district court’s order denying him federal habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 presents this court with the opportunity to revisit our precedent in Walker v. Crosby, 341 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir.2003), and the rule it established with regard to the limitations period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). We now overrule Walker to the extent it holds that § 2244(d)(1) provides a single statute of limitations that applies to the habeas corpus application as a whole and that individual claims within an application cannot be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - MediumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Mark F. Taylor v. Billie J. MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- In re: Clinton YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.