State v. Heidi C. Lilley The State of New Hampshire Kia Sinclair The State of New Hampshire v. Ginger M. Pierro
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHantz Marconi, J.
The defendants, Heidi Lilley, Kia Sinclair, and Ginger Pierro, appeal a ruling of the Circuit Court ( Carroll , J.) that they violated a City of Laconia ordinance prohibiting them from appearing in a state of nudity in a public place. See Laconia, N.H., Code of Ordinances ch. 180, art. I, § 180-2 (1998). We affirm.
I. Background
The following facts are drawn from the trial court's order on the defendants' motion to dismiss or are otherwise supported by the record. On May 28, 2016, Pierro went to Endicott Park Beach in Laconia. At the hearing on the defendants' motion to dismiss, Pierro…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Free the Nipple Springfield Residents Promoting Equal. v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Attorney General v. HoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2025
- City of Manchester v. BellenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
- Edge v. City of EverettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Eline v. Town of Ocean City MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.