State v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This is the second appearance of this case in this court. The facts are fully stated in the opinion on the first appeal, 181 Minn. 262, 232 N. W. 331. The first appeal was from an order overruling a general demurrer to the complaint, the question involved being certified as important and doubtful. The order was affirmed, and the defendant was then permitted to answer. She set up as defenses the statute of limitations, laches in bringing the suit, and estoppel; She also claims that the district court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the fiction. The state demurred to those…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. InsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- State v. NagleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- State v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- First and American National Bank v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- City of South St. Paul v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Sloan v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.