Legal Opinion

Weed v. Commissioner of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1992No. C7-92-339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The Commissioner of Revenue for the State of Minnesota assessed penalties total-ling $2000 against appellant Michael A. Weed for filing frivolous income tax returns for the years 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990. Weed appealed to the Minnesota Tax Court. The case was transferred to Minnesota district court, and the trial court affirmed the rulings of the commissioner. This appeal followed. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On his 1990 Minnesota income tax return, appellant reported that his Minnesota tax was $1568. He also reported that $1577 had been…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Franklet v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holt v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re K.L.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In Re KlbCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API