Wolf v. Gall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiffs brought their action to quiet title to one undivided tenth each in certain real property in the city and county of San Francisco. Their asserted title rested upon their claim of heirship as children of a deceased child of Tobe Funkenstein, their paternal grandmother, their father being Newman Wolf, a son of the said Tobe, who predeceased her. The defendants are the four surviving children of Tobe Funkenstein, issue of her second marriage. They answered to the same effect. They asserted prior ownership in the property in their mother and alleged that on December 21, 1907, she made…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Follmer v. RohrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bertelsen v. BertelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Merritt v. ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Greenstreet v. GreenstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Sasaki v. KaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. PapazianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.