Limoliner, Inc. v. Dattco, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lenk, I.
The plaintiff, Limoliner, Inc. (Limoliner), owns and operates a fleet of luxury motor coaches. In 2011, it hired the defendant, Dattco, Inc. (Dattco), to perform repair work on one those of vehicles, verbally requesting certain specific repairs. The defendant recorded most of those requests in writing, but failed to write down the plaintiff’s request to repair one of the vehicle’s key electrical components. The defendant then failed to make any repairs to that component. Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior Court, alleging, among other things, that, by not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Industrial Finance Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Knapp Shoes, Inc. v. Sylvania Shoe Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Lease-It, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LimoLiner, Inc. v. Dattco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Limoliner, Inc. v. Dattco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- John Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 528042 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
- Malden Transportation, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019