Legal Opinion

Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 3, 2019No. Civil Action No. 16-12538-NMG; consolidated with: 16-12651-NMG; 17-10142-NMG; 17-10180-NMG; 17-10316-NMG; 17-10598-NMG; 17-10586-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge

This case involves a suit by taxi medallion holders ("the Anoush plaintiffs" or "plaintiffs") in the Greater Boston area who allege that Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC (collectively "Uber" or "defendants") competed unlawfully and unfairly in the on-demand, ride-hail ground transportation market in and around Boston, Massachusetts.

I. Background

A. Regulatory Background

The City of Boston has traditionally regulated taxis under a set of municipal rules, ordinances and regulations ("Taxi Rules"), for which the Police Commissioner has the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
Patane v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020