Legal Opinion

LimoLiner, Inc. v. Dattco, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 22, 2019No. 18-1800PPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

*88 We hold that the plaintiff, LimoLiner, has not met its burden of showing that the defendant repair company's technical violations of the Massachusetts Attorney General's regulations that govern motor vehicle repairs, 940 Mass. Code Regs. § 5.05, caused LimoLiner the loss of any money or property. On that basis, we affirm the Magistrate Judge's holding that the repair company is not liable under Chapter 93A. LimoLiner, Inc. v. Dattco, Inc. , No. CV 11-11877-JCB, 2017 WL 6947783 , at *9 (D. Mass. Nov. 27, 2017). We reach no other issue.

I

This lengthy litigation about repair…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Chiang v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J & S Insulation, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Walsh v. Teltech Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Auto Flat Car Crushers, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Cynosure, LLC v. Reveal Lasers LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  3. Ratchford v. Orange Lantern, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API