Lane v. Turner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. W. B. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Defendant and one John Herd, Jr., formed a copartnership for the purpose of farmming a large tract of land; a memorandum of their contract was in writing, dated August 20, 1891, and one of its provisions was that Herd, as his *398contribution to the expense of ploughing and seeding, the land for the first year, would furnish all seed and feed) “ such feed in no case to exceed the sum of fifteen hundred dollars.” October 3, 1891, Herd assigned his interest in said contract to Lane, the plaintiff, who was a grain dealer at Stockton; such assignment being in terms “ security for feed,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Rice v. HeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Case v. MaxeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Haskell v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fee v. McPhee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Grangers' Union v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Martyn v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.