Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, C. J.

This, case has once been passed upon and the judgment affirmed by this Court, but upon a petition for a rehearing the judgment of affirmance was set aside. Since then the case has been elaborately reargued by counsel on behalf of the plaintiff. All the questions involved in the case have, we believe, received that careful attention and consideration by the Court which a case of its merits justly demands. We say this, because counsel have more than intimated that in this respect we were derelict of duty in our former examination and disposition of the case. Regarding…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Peale v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Sooy v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API