Rice v. Heath
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
One Ramon Gonzales was the owner of an interest in certain lands in Santa Barbara County, which Rice was desirous of purchasing. The latter alleges that to effect this purpose he employed Heath to be his agent, and was to pay him $448, and no more, for his services in that respect. Heath, upon the other hand, claims that the agreement was that if he, Heath, should acquire this interest of Gonzales, and cause it to be transferred to Rice, the latter would pay him, Heath, therefor six dollars per acre for each acre of the interest so purchased. Estimating the land purchased at six dollars per…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carpentier v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Gale & Elliott v. Tuolumne Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Norwood v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holt v. Spokane & Palouse Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1893
- Cleary v. City RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Lane v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Taggart v. BoschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Ah OwnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.