Legal Opinion
Perry v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 3, 1989No. Civ. N-87-442 (PCD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD’S MOTION IN LIMINE
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the widow and the personal representative of Jack J. Williams, seek damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (“FELA”) for injuries and death suffered by Mr. Williams allegedly as a result of the negligence of his employer, defendant Metro-North Commuter Railroad (“Metro”). See 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. Pending is Metro’s motion in limine to preclude plaintiff from:
A. Introducing evidence of medical bills and expenses incurred by decedent and paid on his behalf by Metro.
B. Introducing a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rick E. Clark, & Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Corporation, & Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. John T. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Quitmeyer v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Manes v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Brady v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Stanley v. Bertram-Trojan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.