Legal Opinion

In Re LH

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1993No. 92-FS-352, 92-FS-428Published

1Opinion of the Court

634 A.2d 1230 (1993)

In re L.H. and L.H.

F.H. (Mother), Appellant.

Nos. 92-FS-352, 92-FS-428.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued November 17, 1993.

Decided December 20, 1993.

Robert E. Richardson, Washington, DC, for appellant.

Denise L. Wiktor, Washington, DC, for appellees.

Joel G. DeJesus, with whom Michael E. Ward and Mary M. Shaffer, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for amicus curiae, the National Ass'n of Counsel for Children.

John Payton, Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Mary L. Wilson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, DC, filed a Memorandum in Lieu of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Carey v. Crane Service Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API