Legal Opinion
Carey v. Crane Service Co., Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1983No. 81-991PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint in summary judgment context. The case was filed by Harvey and Trithenia Carey, appellants, seeking damages for multiple permanent injuries sustained by Harvey Carey while working in the regular course of his employment with the C.J. Coakley Company. 1 Pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 36-501, Carey was covered by the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq. (1976) (hereinafter LHWCA), at the time of his accident. 2 Section 914(a) of the LHWCA requires that compensation “be paid…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Garrett v. Washington Air Compressor Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- District of Columbia v. MorrisseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Potomac Plaza Terraces, Inc. v. QSC Products, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.