Legal Opinion

Dill v. Westbrook

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1910No. Appeal, No. 52PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 52, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Indiana Co., June T., 1907, No. 84, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of Benson S. Dill, Samuel O. Dill, George S. Dill, Jennie Dill, Mary Ann Ruttinger and Frank Ruttinger, her husband, Amanda Tomb, Lizzie Buchman and Arnold Buchman, her husband, and Samuel O. Dill, Devisee under the Will of Anson J. Dill, deceased, Devisees of Matthew Dill, deceased, v. Laura M. Westbrook and Nathan B. Westbrook, her…

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 52, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Indiana Co., June T., 1907, No. 84, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of Benson S. Dill, Samuel O. Dill, George S. Dill, Jennie Dill, Mary Ann Ruttinger and Frank Ruttinger, her husband, Amanda Tomb, Lizzie Buchman and Arnold Buchman, her husband, and Samuel O. Dill, Devisee under the Will of Anson J. Dill, deceased, Devisees of Matthew Dill, deceased, v. Laura M. Westbrook and Nathan B. Westbrook, her husband, Harry R. Dill, Lizzie R. Stewart and William G. Stewart, her husband, Rose L. Dill, John Lowman, Bertha Lowman, Roy…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

This was an action of ejectment for certain undivided interests in two adjoining tracts of land containing together 564 acres, in Buffington township, Indiana county. All parties to the controversy claimed under and through Matthew Dill, who died in 1847. Plaintiffs are the children of George Dill, son of Matthew, to whom was devised a life estate in the land upon the death of the widow, with remainder, upon the death of both George and James Dill — the latter also a son of *223Matthew, and given a life estate upon the death of George — to the children of George and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  2. Ackerman v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Criswell v. AltemusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  4. Sailor v. HertzoggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  5. Miller v. KeeneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rader v. KeiperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Glass v. TremellenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Kirk v. Ford Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Smith v. Vermont Marble CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  5. Harner v. HarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API