Legal Opinion

Rader v. Keiper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1926No. Appeal, 111PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

This is an action of ejectment in which judgment was entered for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.

The declaration and abstract of title, served on defendant August 11, 1924, with the summons in ejectment, showed a prima facie legal title in plaintiff. On August 15th defendant appeared by attorney.

The Act of May 8, 1901, P. L. 142, as amended by the Act of June 12, 1919, P. L. 478, provides that “the several courts of this Commonwealth shall have power, by general rule or special order, to fix the time within which the defendant shall file his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wise v. Cambridge Springs BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  3. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Dolan v. Boott Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Lance v. BonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brotman v. BrotmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Allshouse's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Yarnall EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Glass v. TremellenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Kurland v. StolkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API