Legal Opinion

Mid-Wilshire Associates v. O'LEARY

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1992No. B058970PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Mid-Wilshire Associates purports to appeal from an order denying its petition to vacate or correct an arbitration award, as well as an earlier order compelling arbitration of its claims. Appellant is the lessee under a 99-year land lease between respondents Winifred K. and Charles O’Leary, and appellant’s predecessor in interest. Respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., succeeded to the interest of Charles O’Leary. We conclude that the orders appealed from are not appealable and dismiss the appeal.

Facts and Procedural Background

The instant litigation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Jordan v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Glesby v. Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. U. FIREFIGHTERS OF LOS ANGELES v. City of LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Ahdout v. HekmatjahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Sy First Family Ltd. Partnership v. CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API