Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1955No. L. A. 23643PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner seeks to annul the order of respondent court adjudging him guilty of contempt for failure to pay the sum of $195 theretofore ordered to be paid by him as counsel fees and court costs. He contends that his conviction of contempt was an act in excess of jurisdiction because there was no evidence to show that he had knowledge or notice of the provisions of the order which he allegedly disobeyed. However, the record in the contempt proceeding does not sustain his contention, and his conviction of contempt must be affirmed.

On July 9, 1954, petitioner was ordered to pay said sum in an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Corenevsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Spaziani v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Jones v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Herman v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API