Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hitchcock

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 1, 1896No. 84PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Memorandum.— Error from Shawnee district court; John Guthrie, judge. ' Action by J. H. Hitchcock and others against George D. Hale, as administrator, on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered.by '

Garver, J. :

The note sued on in this case was made payable to John L. Howard, or order, and was, by Howard, transferred by an indorsement as follows : "John L. Howard. I assign this note to W.'. H. Aldaffer, without recourse.” W. H. Aldaffer thereafter, and before maturity of the .note, transferred it to defendants in error (plaintiffs below) and indorsed his name on the back thereof. The defendant below contends that the note lost its negotiable character by being assigned to Aldaffer, and not indorsed, and that the plaintiffs below took it subject…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Halbert v. EllwoodCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huntington v. LombardWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Warren v. GruwellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  3. Hale v. AldafferCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  4. Merchants Savings Bank v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API