Legal Opinion

Huntington v. Lombard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1900No. 3333PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Yakima County. — Hon. John B. Davidson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Reavis, J.

During the summer of 1892, and for some time prior thereto, Crippen, Lawrence & Co. were engaged in the business of making farm loans and selling irrigation pumps. G-. M. McKinney was their general agent in charge of their business in the state, at Dorth Yakima. McKinney, as such agent, proposed to appellant, Lombard, that if he would make application under the desert ]and law of the United States and enter the land designated by McKinney, adjacent to the Columbia river, Crippen, Lawrence & Co. would pay all expenses incident thereto, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hawkins v. . PembertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. State v. KnowltonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hopkins v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. First National Bank v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Barnett v. HaganIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API