Hale v. Aldaffer

The material facts in this case are substantially the same as those involved in the case of Hale v. Hitchcock, 3 Kan. App. 23 ; the note sued on being the companion note to the one made the basis *41of the action in that case. Much of the evidence in this case, as well as some of the' special findings of the jury, add to the facts a coloring which was absent from the former case ; but the essential facts remain the same. W. H. Aldaffer, the defendant in error, a^d Milton S. Aldaffer, on the one side, and John L. Howard, on the other side, agreed upon a certain exchange and trade of real estate,…