Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1997No. 1997-0970PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 134.] THE STATE EX REL. FINDLAY PUBLISHING COMPANY v. HANCOCK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. [Cite as State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.,

1997-Ohio-353.] Public records—Mandamus compelling Hancock County Board of Commissioners to provide relator access to a settlement agreement containing a confidentiality provision in a civil rights violation lawsuit—Writ granted, when—Attorney fees granted, when. (No. 97-970—Submitted August 26, 1997—Decided October 22, 1997.) IN MANDAMUS.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Horton v. Kilbane (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Armatas v. Plain Twp. Bd. of Trustees (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API