Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. General Dynamics Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 28, 1986No. CR-85-1123 FFFPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FERNANDEZ, District Judge.

On December 2, 1985, the Grand Jury charged General Dynamics Corporation, James M. Beggs, Ralph' E. Hawes, Jr., David L. McPherson, and James C. Hansen, Jr., with conspiracy to defraud the United States. It also charged them with a number of substantive offenses for filing false writings and documents with the Department of Defense (DOD). The latter charges were filed under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.

Defendants have made a number of pretrial motions. Among them are a Motion to Dismiss the Indictment for Failure to Charge an Offense, and a Motion to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. D'AlessioDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. United States v. DaleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  4. United States v. BryantDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  5. United States v. SeibertDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API