Legal Opinion

United States v. Dale

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 14, 1991No. Crim. 90-27PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendants Automated Data Management, Inc. (“ADM”), David M. Dale (“Dale”), Michelle Ashton (“Ashton”), Terrence Sweeney (“Sweeney”), and Martin Segal (“Segal”) are charged in a ten count Indictment with conspiracy, 1 subscribing to and aiding and assisting in the preparation and presentation of false and fraudulent tax returns, 2 attempted tax evasion, 3 wire fraud, 4 false statements, 5 concealing facts by trick, scheme and artifice, 6 and aiding and abetting. 7 In short, the Indictment alleges that defendants participated in a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. CisnerosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. United States v. Crop Growers Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  3. United States v. HillieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. United States v. AshtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. United States v. BryantDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API