United States v. Dale
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Defendants Automated Data Management, Inc. (“ADM”), David M. Dale (“Dale”), Michelle Ashton (“Ashton”), Terrence Sweeney (“Sweeney”), and Martin Segal (“Segal”) are charged in a ten count Indictment with conspiracy, 1 subscribing to and aiding and assisting in the preparation and presentation of false and fraudulent tax returns, 2 attempted tax evasion, 3 wire fraud, 4 false statements, 5 concealing facts by trick, scheme and artifice, 6 and aiding and abetting. 7 In short, the Indictment alleges that defendants participated in a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. CisnerosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. Crop Growers Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- United States v. HillieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. AshtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. BryantDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.