Crow v. CITICORP ACCEPTANCE CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
The first issue raised by this appeal is whether it should be dismissed as premature. The order dismissing the class action does not determine the controversy and is interlocutory. However, the order affects a substantial right of the unnamed plaintiffs and is immediately appealable. Perry v. Cullipher, 69 N.C. App. 761, 318 S.E. 2d 354 (1984).
In English v. Realty Corp., 41 N.C. App. 1, 254 S.E. 2d 223, disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 609, 257 S.E. 2d 217 (1979), we set out six requirements for class actions under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 23(a).
These requirements are:
1. The existence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- English v. Holden Beach Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Mosley v. National Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Perry v. CullipherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Mills v. CAROLINA CEMETERY PARK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- PITTS v. AMERICAN SECURITY INS. CO.North Carolina Business Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.