Legal Opinion

Perry v. Cullipher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1984No. 836SC395PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The first question posed by this appeal is whether it should be dismissed as premature. The order holding that the action is not a class action does not determine the controversy and is interlocutory. The plaintiff argues that he is entitled to appeal under the substantial right exception of G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27(d)(l). An interlocutory order is appealable if it affects a substantial right and will work injury to the appellants if not corrected before final judgment. Investments v. Housing, Inc., 292 N.C. 93, 232 S.E. 2d 667 (1977). If the court erred in refusing to certify…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wachovia Realty Investments v. Housing, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. English v. Holden Beach Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Cardwell v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Bennett v. 3 C Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Harbour Point Homeowners'assoc., Inc. Ex Rel. Bd. of Dir. v. Djf EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API