Legal Opinion

People v. Flood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1919No. Crim. No. 645PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Defendant, jointly with Robert A. Benkert, was, by information containing two counts, charged with the crime of forging two checks, copies of which are set forth in the information. Upon a separate trial given him, he was convicted upon both counts of the information. His motion for a new trial was denied, and from this order and the judgment of imprisonment pronounced he has appealed.

Of the several alleged errors assigned as grounds for reversal, the most important thereof, says counsel for appellant, is want of evidence sufficient to corroborate the testimony of Benkert, who was a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. RolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. State v. OrrIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API