Legal Opinion

Horsch v. Terminix International Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 23, 1993No. 69,228PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

The Terminix International Company (Terminix) appeals from a jury verdict awarding damages to Steven W. Horsch and Jane E. Horsch for Terminix’s negligence in a termite inspection. Terminix also claims the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and related costs to the Horsches. We affirm.

The Horsches entered into a contract for the purchase of a farmhouse, outbuildings, personal property, and five acres of land. The purchase price was $50,000. The purchase contract required a termite inspection certificate be furnished to the Horsches.

Three days before the contract was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Foster v. HumburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rivera Colón v. Díaz ArochoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
  2. Smith v. Kansas Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. United Proteins, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. DeSpiegelaere v. KillionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  5. Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API