Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1985No. C-3361PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Justice.

This is a suit for damages under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The action was instituted by Donald E. McKnight upon discovery of termite damage to his home. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of McKnight. The court of appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment in favor of Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc., 678 S.W.2d 515. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

In March 1968, McKnight executed a termite treatment and control contract with Hill & Hill. The contract was extended through the payment of a yearly fee and annual…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Freeman v. Texas Compensation Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. MurdockTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Haynes & Boone v. Bowser Bouldin, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. Lufkin Indus., LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Carrow v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API