Legal Opinion

Foster v. Humburg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 30, 1956No. 40,174, 40,175PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tbe opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

These two consolidated appeals arise out of actions brought to recover damages to real and personal property occasioned by an explosion and fire. The two cases are identical as far as the questions involved herein are concerned.

The appellants will be hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, and the appellees as defendants."

In case No. 40,174, plaintiff Foster, owner of the dwelling in question, seeks to recover damages to her house, loss of rentál, and prays for damages in the amount of $995.15.

In case No. 40,175, plaintiffs Cantwell, tenants of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Sundgren v. Topeka Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  4. Holmes v. KalbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Davison v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Jones v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Ettus v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API