E.R. v. State

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Associate Presiding Judge:

T1 E.R. (Father) appeals the decision of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to the termination trial, that reunification services were insufficient under the Indian Child Welfare Act, and that the juvenile court was divested of jurisdiction when the statutory eighteen-month term for termination of parental rights expired. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 Father is the biological father of three children: V.H., E.R., and P.R. On March 31, 2004, the Division of Child and Family…