Legal Opinion
Clark v. Rose
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1974No. 74 Civ. 2598 HRTPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge, and TYLER and BRIEANT, District Judges. TYLER, District Judge.
On July 11, 1974, a three-judge court was convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284, to consider the constitutionality of the Wilson-Pakula Law, New York Election Law § 137 (McKinney’s Consol.Laws 1964, c. 17, 1973-74 Supp.) 1 (the “statute”), which provides that a person who is not a member of a political party may not receive that party’s nomination or run in its primary unless that person receives the authorization of the majority of the party’s State Committee 2 or of such other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jenness v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rosario v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Seergy v. Kings County Republican County CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thorsted v. GregoireDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Alwin E. Hopfmann v. Michael Joseph ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Ramsey Clark and Chandra Carr v. Alex RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Mrazek v. Suffolk County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Restivo v. CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF STATE OF NEW YORKDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.