Legal Opinion

Mrazek v. Suffolk County Board of Elections

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 25, 1980No. 614, Docket 79-7642PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

Appellants herein seek favorable resolution of an issue left undecided in Montano v. Lefkowitz, 575 F.2d 378 (2d Cir. 1978), and determined adversely to them by the court below: that is, whether the “one-person, one-vote” principle is violated when members of a political party residing outside a particular political district are permitted under state law and party charter to participate in the nomination of non-party candidates seeking to represent that district *892in the state legislature. Such participation, in appellants’ view, violates the equal protection and due…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Polk v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Smith v. SettleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
  3. Republican Party of State of Conn. v. TashjianDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
  4. Di Rosa v. DoddDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  5. 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1150, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,733 Andrew Polk v. Werner H. Kramarsky, Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York State Division of Human Rights, an Agency of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API