Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
The question presented is whether this court should adopt for Alaska the doctrine of strict liability in tort in product liability cases.
Appellant purchased a new Plymouth Fury I station wagon automobile from ap-pellee Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc., which had been manufactured by appellee Chrysler Corporation. Some three weeks after she had taken delivery appellant became ill after she had had occasion to sit in the automobile for an extended period of time with the engine running, with the heater on full force, and with the side window rolled partially down.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. BeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.